Let’s be honest—traditional cloud cost management metrics aren’t cutting it anymore. While “Cloud Spend by Service” dashboards and untagged resource reports served us well in the early cloud days, they’re increasingly inadequate for today’s complex reality. Our customers are managing intricate multi-cloud and hybrid architectures where traditional cost visibility approaches simply fall short.
At CloudBolt, we believe a more advanced, automation-first approach is needed—one that not only enhances visibility but also drives action and delivers measurable financial impact.
This guide introduces seven strategic cloud cost metrics that embody Augmented FinOps—a new era of cloud financial management where automation, AI-driven insights, and unified visibility work together to transform how organizations optimize cloud spend.
These aren’t just metrics for tracking costs; they’re designed to:
- Move beyond cost reporting to enable proactive cloud optimization
- Ensure accountability across teams by fostering engagement and ownership
- Measure the effectiveness of automation in eliminating inefficiencies
- Create a path toward financial predictability and long-term cost efficiency
Additionally, these metrics lay the foundation for achieving true Unit Economics—where cloud costs are directly tied to business value rather than just technical operations. Later this year, CloudBolt will release a comprehensive guide on Unit Economics, providing deeper insights into this transformative approach.
It’s time to move beyond reactive cloud cost management. Let’s talk about how these metrics can help your organization build a more efficient, predictable, and value-driven cloud strategy.
The 7 cloud cost metrics
- Total cost allocation coverage
- Budget variance score
- Architecture cost accuracy score
- Optimized cloud spend rate
- Insight-to-action time
- Optimization velocity burndown
- Users engaged with FinOps initiatives
Total cost allocation coverage
As cloud environments grow more complex, tracking where cloud spend is going—and who is responsible for it—is essential. Total cost allocation coverage measures the percentage of total cloud costs that are properly attributed to business units, projects, or teams. The higher the percentage, the clearer the financial picture, making it easier to manage budgets, optimize resources, and drive accountability.
Without proper allocation, cloud costs become difficult to control. Untracked or miscategorized spending leads to budget overruns, inaccurate forecasting, and missed optimization opportunities. A strong allocation strategy ensures that every dollar spent is tied to a business purpose, enabling chargeback/showback models, precise budgeting, and better financial decision-making.
Unlike traditional cost tracking, this metric extends beyond public cloud services, extending to private cloud, Kubernetes, and SaaS environments, ensuring a holistic view of cloud investments. By improving total cost allocation coverage, organizations can create transparency, enforce financial discipline, and empower teams to take ownership of their costs.
Formula: Total cost allocation coverage = (Allocated cloud spend / total cloud spend) x 100
where:
- Allocated cloud spend: Total cloud costs with proper business unit attribution
- Total cloud spend: All cloud-related expenses in measurement period
- Result expressed as percentage
Follow these steps to calculate and improve total cost allocation coverage:
1. Identify allocated and unallocated costs.
- Classify cloud resources based on business units, projects, or owners.
- Use cost management tools (e.g., CloudBolt) to track tagged vs. untagged costs and account-specific allocations.
2. Apply the allocation formula.
Total cost allocation coverage = (Allocated cloud spend / total cloud spend) x 100
3. Use FOCUS-aligned data for granular tracking.
For organizations using FOCUS-compliant data, the following SQL query can be used to measure allocation effectiveness across charge periods:
SELECT
ChargePeriodStart,
ChargePeriodEnd,
(SUM(CASE
WHEN JSON_EXTRACT(Tags, '$.[tag_key]') IS NOT NULL
THEN EffectiveCost
ELSE 0
END) / NULLIF(SUM(EffectiveCost), 0)) * 100 AS AllocationPercentage,
SUM(CASE
WHEN JSON_EXTRACT(Tags, '$.[tag_key]') IS NOT NULL
THEN EffectiveCost
ELSE 0
END) AS AllocatedCost,
SUM(CASE
WHEN JSON_EXTRACT(Tags, '$.[tag_key]') IS NULL
THEN EffectiveCost
ELSE 0
END) AS UnallocatedCost,
SUM(EffectiveCost) AS TotalCost
FROM focus_data_table
WHERE ChargePeriodStart >= [start_date]
AND ChargePeriodEnd < [end_date]
AND EffectiveCost > 0
GROUP BY ChargePeriodStart, ChargePeriodEnd;
Key adjustments for your organization:
- Replace [tag_key] with relevant allocation tags (e.g., BusinessUnit, CostCenter, ProjectID).
- Define [start_date] and [end_date] to specify the charge period for analysis.
Example:
- A company has $5M in total cloud spend for a given period.
- $4.2M is tagged and properly allocated to specific business units.
- The total cost allocation coverage would be: (4.2M / 5M) x 100 = 84%
4. Track and improve over time.
- Identify areas where cost allocation is incomplete (e.g., shadow IT, missing tags).
- Implement automated tagging policies to reduce unallocated costs and ensure continuous improvements in cost allocation rates.
Success benchmarks
Organizations should target these allocation rates based on their FinOps maturity:
- Crawl: 70-85% allocated spend (early-stage tagging & tracking)
- Walk: 85-95% allocated spend (established cost allocation strategy)
- Run: 95%+ allocated spend (fully enforced tagging & automation)
Higher allocation coverage ensures that cloud investments align with business goals, improving financial transparency, governance, and accountability.
Budget variance score
Cloud spending is inherently dynamic, making budget adherence a critical component of financial governance. The budget variance score tracks how closely actual cloud costs align with budgeted forecasts, helping organizations improve cost predictability and avoid unnecessary overspending.
When teams consistently overshoot budgets, it signals issues such as inaccurate forecasting, underutilized cost controls, or inefficient resource scaling. On the other hand, significantly underspending could indicate over-provisioning or missed opportunities for strategic cloud investments.
Formula: Budget variance score = 100 – |(actual spend – budgeted spend) / budgeted spend| x 100
where:
- Actual spend: Real cloud spending in measurement period
- Budgeted spend: Planned cloud spending for same period
- Result expressed as score from 0-100
To accurately calculate budget variance score, follow these steps:
1. Define budgeted spend.
- Establish the budget for each cloud account, service, or cost center.
- Reference budget data from financial planning tools or dedicated budget tables.
2. Compare against actual spend.
Extract actual cloud spending from cloud billing reports for the same time period.
3. Apply the variance score formula.
Measure how much actual spend deviates from budgeted amounts.
Example query:
WITH PeriodSpend AS (
SELECT
ProviderName,
SubAccountId,
SubAccountName,
ChargePeriodStart,
ChargePeriodEnd,
SUM(BilledCost) AS TotalActualSpend
FROM focus_data_table
WHERE ChargePeriodStart >= [start_date]
AND ChargePeriodEnd < [end_date]
AND ChargeClass IS NULL -- Excludes corrections from previous periods
GROUP BY
ProviderName,
SubAccountId,
SubAccountName,
ChargePeriodStart,
ChargePeriodEnd
)
SELECT
p.ProviderName,
p.SubAccountId,
p.SubAccountName,
p.ChargePeriodStart,
p.ChargePeriodEnd,
p.TotalActualSpend,
b.BudgetAmount,
((p.TotalActualSpend - b.BudgetAmount) / NULLIF(b.BudgetAmount, 0)) * 100 AS VariancePercentage,
GREATEST(0, 100 - ABS(((p.TotalActualSpend - b.BudgetAmount) / NULLIF(b.BudgetAmount, 0)) * 100)) AS BudgetVarianceScore,
CASE
WHEN p.TotalActualSpend > b.BudgetAmount THEN 'Over Budget'
WHEN p.TotalActualSpend < b.BudgetAmount * 0.95 THEN 'Under Budget'
ELSE 'On Target'
END AS BudgetStatus
FROM PeriodSpend p
LEFT JOIN budget_reference b
ON p.SubAccountId = b.SubAccountId
AND p.ChargePeriodStart = b.PeriodStart;
4. Analyze budget variance trends.
- Identify which teams, accounts, or workloads frequently exceed budget.
- Adjust cost forecasting models based on recurring patterns.
Success benchmarks
Ideal budget variance score targets depend on an organization’s cloud maturity, risk tolerance, and workload type.
Stable production workloads:
- Crawl: 70-85 Budget Variance Score (±15-30% variance) — Budgeting processes are being established, but unpredictability is high.
- Walk: 85-95 Budget Variance Score (±5-15% variance) — More structured forecasting improves cost control.
- Run: 95+ Budget Variance Score (±0-10% variance) — High accuracy in cost forecasting and proactive governance.
Highly variable or dev/test environments:
- Crawl: 60-75 Budget Variance Score (±25-40% variance) — Unpredictable spending patterns make budgeting difficult.
- Walk: 75-90 Budget Variance Score (±15-25% variance) — Better tracking and automation start improving forecasting.
- Run: 90+ Budget Variance Score (±10-15% variance) — More proactive cost controls stabilize budget alignment.
Net-new deployments or migrations:
- Crawl: ±30-50% variance — Initial deployments face significant cost uncertainty.
- Walk: ±20-30% variance — Teams improve estimations based on prior deployments.
- Run: ±10-20% variance — Advanced organizations plan migrations with near-exact cost control.
Project-based workloads:
- Crawl: ±30-50% variance — Forecasting is difficult due to shifting scope.
- Walk: ±20-30% variance — Estimation improves as project patterns emerge.
- Run: ±10-15% variance — Mature FinOps teams maintain tight cost controls over projects.
Organizations should regularly benchmark variance scores to identify improvement areas and refine budgeting strategies over time.
Architecture cost accuracy score
Accurate cost estimation is the backbone of financial predictability in cloud environments. The architecture cost accuracy score measures how closely an organization’s estimated cloud costs align with actual cloud spending over time. This metric is crucial for budget planning, resource provisioning, and financial governance, helping organizations refine their forecasting models and prevent unexpected cost overruns.
Cloud cost estimates often miss the mark due to unaccounted scaling, workload spikes, or misaligned resource provisioning. When estimates are consistently inaccurate, teams may face budget shortfalls, unnecessary over-provisioning, or wasted cloud investments. By improving cost accuracy, organizations gain tighter financial control and ensure that planned workloads align with real-world cloud consumption.
Formula: Architecture cost accuracy score = 100 – |(planned cost – actual cost) / planned cost| x 100
where:
- Planned cost: Estimated cloud costs from architecture planning
- Actual cost: Real cloud spending for implemented architecture
- Result expressed as score from 0-100
To calculate architecture cost accuracy score, follow these steps:
1. Define your planned costs.
Retrieve estimated costs for cloud workloads from your ITSM system (e.g., ServiceNow, Jira, or AzDo) or another budgeting system.
2. Compare against actual spend.
Extract real spending data from cloud billing sources over 30, 60, and 90-day intervals.
3. Apply the accuracy score formula.
Measure the deviation between estimated and actual costs.
Example query:
WITH ActualCosts AS (
SELECT
f.ResourceId,
SUM(f.EffectiveCost) as actual_cost,
MIN(f.ChargePeriodStart) as first_charge_date
FROM focus_data_table f
WHERE f.ChargePeriodStart >= DATEADD(day, -60, CURRENT_DATE)
GROUP BY f.ResourceId
)
SELECT
e.ResourceId,
e.estimated_monthly_cost,
a.actual_cost as actual_30day_cost,
-- Accuracy Score
100 - ABS((e.estimated_monthly_cost - a.actual_cost) /
NULLIF(e.estimated_monthly_cost, 0)) * 100 as accuracy_score,
-- Variance Analysis
(a.actual_cost - e.estimated_monthly_cost) as cost_variance,
-- Status Indicator
CASE
WHEN a.actual_cost > e.estimated_monthly_cost * 1.1 THEN 'Significantly Over'
WHEN a.actual_cost > e.estimated_monthly_cost THEN 'Over Estimate'
WHEN a.actual_cost < e.estimated_monthly_cost * 0.9 THEN 'Significantly Under'
WHEN a.actual_cost < e.estimated_monthly_cost THEN 'Under Estimate'
ELSE 'On Target'
END as estimation_status,
-- Deployment Context
e.deployment_date,
a.first_charge_date,
DATEDIFF(day, a.first_charge_date, CURRENT_DATE) as days_since_deployment
FROM estimation_source e
JOIN ActualCosts a
ON e.ResourceId = a.ResourceId
WHERE DATEDIFF(day, a.first_charge_date, CURRENT_DATE) >= 30;
4. Analyze and improve.
Identify consistent under- or over-estimations and adjust planning processes accordingly.
Success benchmarks
Target scores vary based on workload type and business needs.
Production workloads:
- Crawl: 70-80% accuracy (initial 30-day tracking, early-stage cost forecasting)
- Walk: 80-90% accuracy (stabilized 90-day tracking, improved forecasting processes)
- Run: 90%+ accuracy (long-term predictability, continuous optimization in place)
Development/testing environments:
- Crawl: 60-75% accuracy (high variability, initial tracking phase)
- Walk: 75-85% accuracy (gradual stabilization of cost forecasting)
- Run: 85%+ accuracy (mature cost tracking with well-established forecasting methods)
By continuously refining cost estimation models, organizations can improve financial predictability, avoid unnecessary budget reallocations, and ensure cloud investments align with operational needs.
Optimized cloud spend rate
Maximizing cloud efficiency isn’t just about reducing spend—it’s about ensuring that every dollar spent is intentional and optimized. Optimized cloud spend rate measures the percentage of total cloud expenses that benefit from cost-saving strategies, including pricing optimizations (reserved instances, savings plans, enterprise agreements) and resource optimizations (right-sizing, scheduling, automated de-provisioning).
A highly optimized spending rate indicates that a company is effectively leveraging cost-saving mechanisms to minimize unnecessary expenses. A low rate, on the other hand, signals missed opportunities, such as underutilized savings plans, oversized resources, or inefficient provisioning. Tracking this metric allows organizations to identify gaps in optimization coverage, validate their cost-efficiency strategies, and refine their approach over time.
Formula: Optimized cloud spend rate = (Spend covered by cost-saving mechanisms / total cloud spend) x 100
where:
- Spend covered by cost-saving mechanisms: Expenses utilizing discounts, reserved instances, or other optimizations
- Total cloud spend: Total cloud expenses in measurement period
- Result expressed as percentage
To calculate optimized cloud spend rate effectively, follow these steps:
1. Define your total cloud spend.
Aggregate all cloud service costs over a given period.
2. Identify cost-saving mechanisms.
Filter out spend covered by committed use discounts (reserved instances, savings plans, enterprise agreements) and resource optimizations (right-sizing, scheduling).
3. Apply the optimization rate formula.
Use structured queries to measure the proportion of optimized spend against the total cloud spend.
Example query:
SELECT
ServiceName,
ResourceType,
SUM(ListCost) as TotalListCost,
SUM(EffectiveCost) as TotalEffectiveCost,
((SUM(ListCost) - SUM(EffectiveCost)) /
NULLIF(SUM(ListCost), 0)) * 100 as OptimizationRate,
SUM(CASE
WHEN PricingCategory = 'Committed'
THEN EffectiveCost
ELSE 0
END) / NULLIF(SUM(EffectiveCost), 0) * 100 as CommitmentCoverage,
COUNT(CASE
WHEN CommitmentDiscountStatus IS NOT NULL
THEN 1
END) as OptimizedResources,
COUNT(*) as TotalResources
FROM focus_data_table
WHERE ChargePeriodStart >= [start_date]
AND ChargePeriodEnd < [end_date]
AND ChargeCategory IN ('Usage', 'Purchase')
GROUP BY
ServiceName,
ResourceType;
4. Interpret the results.
Compare your optimization rate to industry benchmarks to assess performance.
Success benchmarks
The ideal optimized cloud spend rate varies by workload type:
Production workloads:
- Crawl: 20-30% optimization rate
- Walk: 30-45% optimization rate
- Run: 45-60% optimization rate
Development/testing environments:
- Crawl: 10-20% optimization rate
- Walk: 20-30% optimization rate
- Run: 30-40% optimization rate
Organizations should regularly evaluate and refine their optimization strategies to move up the maturity curve, ensuring cloud spend is proactively optimized rather than reactively managed.
Insight-to-action time
In 2025, automation isn’t just an advantage—it’s a necessity. Insight-to-action time measures how quickly a team identifies a cost-saving opportunity and implements the necessary action. The faster this process, the less waste accumulates, and the more efficiently cloud spending is optimized.
For example, an idle resource costing $1,000 per month—if identified and shut down within two days—saves $940 for that month. But if it takes ten days to act, the savings drop to $660. Across an entire cloud environment, these delays can compound into significant unrealized savings.
By tracking and improving this metric, organizations can eliminate approval bottlenecks, automate remediation, and ensure cost optimizations happen in near real-time—rather than weeks later. Companies that achieve faster Insight-to-Action Times gain a competitive edge in cost control, financial predictability, and cloud efficiency.
Formula: Insight-to-action (days) = Date implemented – date identified
where:
- Date implemented: Date when optimization is implemented
- Date identified: Date when saving opportunity is first detected
Follow these steps to calculate this metric accurately:
1. Log each cost-saving opportunity.
Create a table or structured tracking system with the following columns:
- Opportunity ID (Unique identifier for tracking)
- Date identified (When the cost-saving opportunity was first detected)
- Date implemented (When the optimization action was completed)
2. Calculate the time elapsed.
Use this formula to determine the duration between identification and action:
Insight-to-action time (days) = Date implemented – date identified
Example:
- A cost-saving opportunity is identified on January 1st.
- The corrective action is implemented on January 10th.
- Insight-to-action time = 10 – 1 = 9 days.
3. Track trends over time.
To gain meaningful insights, track and analyze average insight-to-action time across multiple opportunities:
- Calculate the average across a set timeframe (e.g., monthly or quarterly).
- Compare performance across different teams or cost categories.
- Set internal benchmarks to reduce delays over time.
Success Benchmarks
To maximize cost efficiency, organizations should set aggressive yet achievable insight-to-action targets based on their cloud maturity:
- Crawl: Act on 60%+ of high-impact opportunities within 21 days
- Walk: Act on 80%+ of medium/high impact opportunities within 10 days
- Run: Act on 95%+ of medium/high impact opportunities within 5 days
As teams improve automation, streamline approval processes, and integrate better FinOps tooling, these benchmarks should be continuously refined—reducing delays and ensuring cost-saving actions happen in near real-time.
Optimization velocity burndown
Cloud cost optimization will not work if it is treated as a one-off effort by the business—it must be an ongoing process with measurable progress over time. Optimization velocity burndown provides a clear, visual representation of how efficiently an organization executes cost optimizations against its goals.
This metric tracks the gap between the target optimization rate (the percentage of identified savings successfully realized) and the actual optimization velocity over a set period. It can also measure progress toward a specific total savings goal. A well-maintained burndown chart enables teams to monitor whether they are on pace, behind schedule, or exceeding their targets.
For example, if an organization sets a quarterly goal of $250,000 in realized cloud savings and aims for a 10% weekly optimization velocity, this metric helps determine whether they are staying on track—or if adjustments are needed to accelerate cost reductions. If teams consistently fall behind, it may indicate approval bottlenecks, inefficient automation, or a lack of cross-functional alignment. Likewise, strong performance in this metric reflects an organization’s ability to execute optimizations efficiently, turning identified savings into tangible financial impact.
Formula: Optimization velocity burndown = Target optimization rate – actual optimization rate over time
where:
- Target optimization rate: Planned percentage of savings to be realized
- Actual optimization rate: Current percentage of savings achieved
- Measured over defined time period
Follow these steps to effectively measure and visualize optimization velocity burndown:
1. Set your optimization goals.
- Define the total savings goal (e.g., reduce cloud costs by $1 million this year).
- Establish the target optimization velocity (e.g., 10% of identified savings should be realized weekly).
2. Track identified vs. realized savings.
- At regular intervals (e.g., weekly), calculate:
- Identified savings: The total cost-saving opportunities recognized so far.
- Realized savings: The amount of savings successfully executed.
3. Plot the burndown chart.
- X-axis: Time (e.g., weeks or months).
- Y-axis: Remaining unrealized savings.
- The target trajectory is a steady decline from the initial savings goal to zero.
- The actual trajectory tracks whether the organization is keeping pace, exceeding, or lagging behind target expectations.
Example:
- Quarterly savings target: $250,000
- 10-week timeline: Target of $25,000 in realized savings per week
- Week 1: Identified savings = $40,000, realized savings = $20,000
- Week 2: Identified savings = $45,000, realized savings = $22,000
- Week 3: Identified savings = $50,000, realized savings = $30,000
The burndown chart visualizes progress by comparing the actual cumulative savings to the target trajectory, highlighting areas where adjustments may be necessary.
Success benchmarks
Organizations should adjust their optimization targets based on cloud maturity and business objectives:
- Crawl: Actual savings reach 30-50% of target by the halfway mark.
- Walk: Actual savings reach 60-75% of target by the halfway mark.
- Run: Actual savings remain within 90-110% of target trendline throughout the period.
A declining burndown trend indicates strong execution, while a flat or rising trend signals the need for improved automation, streamlined approval workflows, or better cross-team collaboration.
Users engaged with FinOps initiatives
FinOps success isn’t just about tracking cloud costs—it’s about embedding cost awareness and accountability across teams. Users engaged with FinOps initiatives measures the percentage of teams actively participating in cost optimization efforts, providing insight into how well FinOps principles are adopted across the organization.
A high engagement rate indicates that FinOps isn’t just confined to finance or cloud operations—it’s a company-wide discipline where engineering, finance, and leadership work together to optimize costs. In contrast, low engagement suggests that cost management is siloed, leading to missed savings, inefficient provisioning, and a lack of accountability.
Tracking this metric helps organizations identify gaps in FinOps adoption and implement strategies to build a cost-conscious culture, ensuring that teams proactively manage cloud spending rather than treating it as an afterthought.
Formula: Engagement rate = (Number of active users / total potential users) x 100
where:
- Active users: Users participating in FinOps activities within measurement period
- Total potential users: All stakeholders expected to engage in FinOps
- Result expressed as percentage
Follow these steps to track FinOps engagement effectively:
1. Define the total potential user base.
Identify all stakeholders expected to engage in FinOps—this typically includes finance, engineering, and cloud operations teams.
2. Track active participants.
Count the number of users actively participating in FinOps initiatives within a given period (e.g., attending cost review meetings, implementing optimizations, or using FinOps tools).
3. Apply the engagement formula.
Use the formula to calculate engagement: Engagement rate = (Active users / total potential users) x 100
Example:
- An organization has 120 team members expected to engage in FinOps.
- Over the past quarter, 85 individuals participated in cost reviews or executed optimizations.
- Engagement Rate = (85 / 120) x 100 = 70.8%
By tracking engagement over time, organizations can identify trends and adjust their approach to improve adoption. If engagement is low, potential barriers—such as lack of visibility, training gaps, or unclear ownership—should be addressed.
Success benchmarks
Ideal engagement levels vary based on an organization’s FinOps maturity and cloud complexity. General benchmarks include:
- Crawl: 50-65% engagement rate (initial FinOps adoption)
- Walk: 65-80% engagement rate (cross-team collaboration expands)
- Run: 80-90% engagement rate (company-wide cost accountability)
A low engagement rate suggests potential gaps in visibility, training, or alignment between cost accountability and operational goals. Organizations should monitor trends and refine communication, incentives, and training programs to improve FinOps participation.
Discover Augmented FinOps: The Future of Cloud Cost Management
Download the Whitepaper
How to find and utilize these metrics
Calculating and leveraging advanced cloud cost metrics requires more than just tracking numbers—it demands a structured approach that integrates tools, workflows, and collaboration to drive continuous optimization. Organizations that successfully implement these metrics move beyond static reporting to real-time insights and automated actions that reduce waste and improve cloud efficiency. Here’s how to build a workflow that transforms data into impact.
Adopt the right tools for unified visibility and automation
The foundation of effective cloud cost management is a platform that centralizes cost data across all cloud environments—including public cloud, private cloud, Kubernetes, and SaaS. CloudBolt provides this holistic view by aggregating cost, usage, and optimization insights into a single pane of glass.
For organizations earlier in their FinOps journey, native cloud tools like AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Cost Management, and GCP Cloud Billing offer baseline tracking, but they often require manual effort and integrations to create a full financial picture. Scaling FinOps maturity requires automation-first platforms that can detect anomalies, enforce tagging policies, and proactively surface cost-saving opportunities.
Establish workflows for ongoing cost optimization
Once the right tools are in place, organizations must establish repeatable workflows that embed these metrics into everyday cloud financial management. Key steps include:
Automate reporting cycles
Set up weekly or monthly dashboards tracking core metrics like insight-to-action time and optimized cloud spend rate. These reports provide real-time visibility into cost trends, making it easier to spot inefficiencies early.
Enable cross-team collaboration
FinOps isn’t a siloed practice. To ensure cloud cost decisions align with business objectives, organizations should foster communication between finance, engineering, and leadership. For example, engineering teams can share provisioning strategies while finance teams monitor budget adherence—ensuring cloud spending is both efficient and justified.
Integrate and automate key processes
Leverage API-driven integrations with ITSM platforms like ServiceNow or collaboration tools like Slack and Jira to automatically flag cost-saving opportunities. This reduces manual intervention, allowing FinOps teams to act swiftly rather than waiting for budget reviews.
Use AI for real-time anomaly detection
AI-powered tools can continuously monitor cloud spend for unexpected spikes and trigger automated actions. For example, if an underutilized instance exceeds a cost threshold, an automated workflow can resize or shut it down—preventing cost overruns before they happen.
Benchmark performance and refine strategies
Metrics should not be static—they should evolve alongside business needs. By tracking trends in architecture cost accuracy score and optimization velocity burndown over time, organizations can measure improvement, identify bottlenecks, and refine strategies for greater efficiency.
Common pitfalls to avoid
Even with the right metrics in place, organizations often encounter roadblocks that prevent them from realizing their full FinOps potential. Here are the most common pitfalls and how to avoid them.
Tracking too many metrics without focus
While cloud platforms generate vast amounts of cost data, tracking every available metric can lead to analysis paralysis rather than meaningful action. Teams that spread their attention too thin struggle to prioritize optimizations that drive impact.
Instead, organizations should focus on a core set of high-value metrics—like the seven outlined in this guide—that balance financial accountability with operational efficiency. Regularly reviewing your metric portfolio ensures alignment with evolving cloud and business objectives.
Failing to align metrics with business goals
Metrics are only useful if they connect cloud spending to real business outcomes. Without alignment, FinOps risks becoming an isolated cost-reporting function rather than a driver of financial strategy.
For example, tracking budget variance score without linking it to quarterly financial planning results in missed opportunities to proactively course-correct. Metrics should be integrated into business-wide objectives—ensuring that insights lead to strategic decision-making, not just reporting.
Neglecting automation and sticking to manual processes
Cloud cost management at scale cannot be sustained through manual workflows alone. Tagging, anomaly detection, and provisioning adjustments are time-intensive and prone to human error.
Organizations that fail to leverage automation-first FinOps solutions often struggle to scale their cost optimization efforts efficiently. Automating idle resource detection, rightsizing recommendations, and anomaly-based alerts reduces effort and accelerates cost-saving actions.
Ignoring cultural buy-in and cross-team engagement
FinOps isn’t just about data—it’s about driving accountability across teams. Organizations that don’t actively engage engineers, finance teams, and executives will struggle to execute optimizations effectively.
Tracking users engaged with FinOps initiatives provides a clear indicator of adoption and pinpoints where buy-in may be lacking. Regularly communicating wins, sharing savings impact, and embedding FinOps into existing workflows ensures alignment and long-term success.
Overlooking benchmarking and continuous improvement
Metrics lose value if they are treated as static benchmarks rather than evolving tools. Without historical trend analysis or industry comparisons, organizations risk stagnation rather than continuous improvement.
For example, organizations that fail to review their optimized cloud spend rate over time may miss recurring patterns of inefficiency. Establishing a cadence for benchmarking and refining strategies ensures that FinOps remains agile and responsive to changing business and cloud dynamics.
By proactively addressing these pitfalls, organizations can ensure their FinOps practices are scalable, sustainable, and aligned with broader strategic objectives.
A smarter path to cloud efficiency
At CloudBolt, we see a fundamental shift in how organizations approach cloud cost management. The traditional passive monitoring and reactive optimization model is giving way to what we call “automated intelligence”—where cloud cost insights automatically trigger optimizations in real time.
This transformation couldn’t come at a more critical time. Our enterprise customers deal with unprecedented cloud complexity, managing workloads across multiple providers and platforms. The old manual approaches to cost management simply can’t scale with today’s cloud environments, leading to missed optimization opportunities and unnecessary spending.
By adopting the seven strategic metrics outlined in this guide, organizations can move beyond reactive cost monitoring to a proactive, automation-driven strategy that optimizes cloud investments. These metrics—ranging from insight-to-action time to architecture efficiency score—provide the visibility, accountability, and efficiency needed to navigate today’s complex cloud landscape.
The organizations that thrive will be those that embrace automation as the cornerstone of their cloud financial management strategy. The industry’s current focus on better reporting tools and more detailed analytics misses the larger opportunity – using automation to eliminate the gap between identifying savings opportunities and realizing them.
CloudBolt can help you bridge the gap between insight and action. Schedule a demo today to see how automation-driven FinOps can transform your cloud financial management practices.
See Augmented FinOps in Action
Schedule a Demo
The Software as a Service (SaaS) industry continues its robust expansion, significantly reshaping business operations on a global scale. In 2024, the global SaaS market was valued at approximately $209.95 billion, with projections indicating an increase to $231.75 billion in 2025. Looking further ahead, the market is expected to reach $510.67 billion by 2033, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.38% during the forecast period from 2025 to 2033.
As SaaS adoption accelerates, businesses are grappling with the complexities of managing sprawling software portfolios. Without strategic oversight, the rapid proliferation of SaaS can lead to inefficiencies, redundant subscriptions, and unchecked spending. Implementing robust SaaS cost optimization practices ensures that organizations can harness the full potential of their investments while avoiding financial and operational pitfalls.
In this guide, we will explore 7 best practices for SaaS cost optimization, providing actionable insights to help your organization control spending, reduce waste, and align investments with strategic objectives.
The cost of neglecting SaaS optimization
Failing to prioritize SaaS cost optimization can have far-reaching consequences, from budget overruns to operational efficiency. Here’s a deeper look at the potential pitfalls of neglecting this crucial aspect of SaaS management:
1. Unnecessary overpayments
Without regular monitoring, unused or underutilized SaaS licenses can remain active, quietly siphoning funds from your budget. For example, a department might retain licenses for a project-specific tool long after the project ends. These overpayments add up quickly, diverting resources that could otherwise be invested in innovation, employee development, or revenue-generating initiatives. Organizations that lack visibility into their SaaS portfolio risk missing opportunities to reallocate funds where they matter most.
2. Duplication of services
When departments purchase software independently, redundant subscriptions often go unnoticed. For instance, one team might subscribe to a project management app while another uses a different tool with overlapping functionality. These duplications inflate costs unnecessarily and create administrative headaches when managing renewals, support, and integrations. Centralized oversight of SaaS purchases is essential to prevent these inefficiencies and streamline operations.
3. Budget overruns
Untracked SaaS renewals can wreak havoc on financial planning. Many SaaS contracts renew automatically, often at higher rates, leaving organizations with little time to assess whether the tools still provide value. These unexpected price hikes can lead to budget overruns, disrupting financial forecasts and impacting other areas of the business. Proactive renewal tracking and evaluation are critical to maintaining control over your software expenses.
4. Wasted resources
Unmonitored SaaS usage can result in ongoing payments for tools that no longer align with organizational goals. For example, a company might continue paying for an advanced analytics tool that was adopted during a specific initiative but is now rarely used. These wasted resources represent not just financial loss but also missed opportunities to invest in high-impact areas, such as employee training or customer experience improvements. Regular audits can help identify and eliminate such inefficiencies.
5. Increased complexity
As SaaS portfolios grow, managing multiple vendors, contracts, and renewal timelines becomes increasingly challenging. Without a clear strategy, this complexity can overwhelm teams, leading to delays in decision-making and reduced efficiency. For instance, juggling contracts with dozens of vendors can slow down procurement processes or create confusion about which tools should be prioritized. A lack of streamlined SaaS management can leave businesses struggling to maintain agility in a competitive market.
Top 7 SaaS cost optimization best practices
Addressing these challenges starts with adopting a proactive, strategic approach. By implementing proven best practices, organizations can eliminate waste, streamline operations, and ensure every SaaS investment delivers maximum value.
1. Get complete spend visibility
Understanding where your SaaS budget is allocated is the foundation of cost optimization. Without a clear view of spending, unused subscriptions and overpayments can quickly add up, wasting valuable resources.
Centralizing all SaaS spend data into a single system allows you to monitor subscriptions, track usage patterns, and stay on top of renewal cycles. Regular SaaS audits play a critical role in this process by helping identify unused or duplicate software, as well as tools with overlapping functionality.
These audits enable organizations to cancel unnecessary licenses, consolidate subscriptions, and merge multiple teams using similar tools—reducing costs and simplifying management. In addition to uncovering redundancies, audits provide valuable insight into renewal dates, contract terms, and pricing.
This information makes it easier to renegotiate better terms, downgrade plans to align with actual needs, or eliminate underperforming tools altogether. By maintaining complete visibility into your SaaS spending, your organization can make informed decisions that align with business goals, optimize resource allocation, and maximize efficiency.
2. Consolidate overlapping apps and vendors
Relying on multiple providers for similar services can inflate costs unnecessarily and add complexity to management. Consolidating overlapping apps and vendors simplifies operations, reduces administrative overhead, and unlocks opportunities for bulk discounts. For example, merging separate cloud storage subscriptions into a single provider can significantly lower overall spending while streamlining oversight.
Vendor consolidation also simplifies the management of SaaS contracts and renewals. With fewer vendors to negotiate with, you can secure better terms, reduce invoicing complexities, and improve visibility across your software portfolio. This approach not only reduces administrative workloads but also ensures that resources are used effectively and efficiently.
By consolidating SaaS apps and vendors, your organization avoids overpaying for underutilized services and benefits from more favorable pricing and streamlines license management, delivering long-term value.
3. Reclaim unused licenses with workflows
Unused SaaS licenses are a common source of wasted spending, but proactive management can turn this challenge into an opportunity for savings. By continuously monitoring SaaS usage, businesses can identify underutilized licenses and eliminate excess costs.
For instance, if certain users don’t require advanced features, downgrading their accounts to a basic plan can yield substantial savings. Tracking usage patterns also helps avoid over-purchasing by ensuring your company only pays for what is actively used.
License harvesting workflows play a key role in reclaiming these unused assets. These workflows identify underutilized licenses and reallocate them to employees who need access, optimizing resource use without overspending.
This approach also ensures employees have the tools they need to work effectively, striking the right balance between availability and cost efficiency. Adjusting subscriptions based on actual usage not only reduces waste but also builds a more cost-effective and agile SaaS portfolio.
4. Automate renewals to avoid surprises
Manually tracking SaaS renewals often leads to costly oversights, such as unexpected charges for unused subscriptions or missed opportunities to negotiate better terms. Automating renewal tracking ensures you stay ahead of deadlines and maintain control over your SaaS portfolio. This proactive approach allows you to focus on optimizing your software investments instead of managing complex renewal schedules.
Automated renewal reminders enable businesses to evaluate the necessity of each subscription before it renews. For example, if a tool hasn’t been used recently, you can cancel or downgrade it prior to the renewal date, avoiding unwanted costs or price increases.
Setting up alerts and workflows for renewal management not only reduces manual work but also prevents contracts from being overlooked. By integrating automation into your SaaS strategy, you can take timely actions that minimize waste and ensure cost-effective software spending.
5. Prevent shadow IT
Shadow IT—the unauthorized purchase or use of software by employees or teams—poses a significant challenge for organizations managing multiple SaaS tools. This unregulated behavior can lead to duplicate applications, hidden costs, increased security risks, and a lack of overall control over your tech stack. Over time, this “SaaS sprawl” creates confusion, compliance risks, and unnecessary expenses that undermine efficiency and inflate costs.
To effectively address shadow IT, proactive measures are essential. Regular audits can help identify unapproved apps, eliminate redundancies, and ensure resources are allocated effectively. Establishing a clear and straightforward approval process empowers employees to access the tools they need while adhering to company policies.
6. Use a SaaS management platform (SMP)
A SaaS management platform (SMP) is one of the most powerful tools for mastering SaaS cost optimization. By automating tedious tasks such as tracking renewal dates, monitoring usage patterns, and identifying underutilized or unused licenses, an SMP simplifies cost management and reduces administrative burdens. These platforms help organizations reassign or cancel licenses efficiently, ensuring that every dollar spent contributes to actual business needs.
Beyond automation, SMPs foster cross-departmental collaboration by centralizing workflows and enhancing visibility across the SaaS ecosystem. This centralization enables better decision-making and smoother operations, while custom workflows and role-based approval processes prevent unnecessary purchases or unnoticed actions. With an SMP, businesses can save time, control shadow IT, and minimize wasted resources, all while maximizing ROI on their SaaS investments.
Adopting an SMP provides complete visibility and control over your software portfolio, ensuring your organization operates efficiently and cost-effectively in an increasingly SaaS-driven landscape.
7. Negotiate with price benchmarks
Negotiating SaaS contracts is an essential step in securing better pricing and optimizing your budget. By benchmarking vendor prices, you gain valuable insights into industry standards, ensuring you’re not overpaying. For instance, if your renewal price exceeds the market average, this information can be used as leverage to negotiate a lower rate.
Benchmarking also helps you select pricing models that best align with your organization’s needs. For example, transitioning from a pay-per-user plan to a volume-based pricing model can lead to significant savings if your team size justifies the shift. Regularly reviewing contracts and staying ahead of renewal deadlines prevents unnecessary price hikes and avoids overcommitting to long-term agreements at inflated rates.
Being proactive in contract discussions ensures you achieve the best possible deal while maintaining flexibility. By leveraging price benchmarks, organizations can align their SaaS spending with strategic priorities, reduce costs, and maximize the ROI of their software investments.
Emerging trends in SaaS cost optimization
As SaaS adoption continues to rise, organizations are turning to innovative strategies to enhance efficiency and reduce costs. By staying ahead of these developments, businesses can optimize their SaaS investments while positioning themselves for long-term success.
1. AI-powered insights
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are revolutionizing SaaS management by providing real-time visibility into inefficiencies and waste. For example, AI-drive tools can identify inactive licenses or overlapping apps across teams, offering actionable recommendations for consolidation and contract renegotiation. These advanced analytics not only reduce manual oversight but also empower businesses to make data-driven decisions that unlock immediate cost savings.
2. Integrated management platforms
Managing SaaS, IaaS, and PaaS tools across departments is increasingly complex, but integrated platforms are streamlining operations. By consolidating workflows, tracking renewals, and providing a unified view of software portfolios, these solutions allow IT and finance teams to collaborate more effectively. A unified approach to oversight reduces redundancies, enhances visibility, and supports better resource allocation, making it easier to manage both SaaS and cloud environments cohesively.
3. Proactive vendor collaboration
Benchmarking tools have become indispensable for negotiating smarter vendor contracts. By comparing pricing, identifying savings opportunities, and exploring favorable terms like volume-based discounts, organizations are better equipped to optimize spending. Data-driven negotiation strategies ensure that businesses secure favorable terms while maintaining flexibility in their software agreements.
4. Sustainability in SaaS
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations are influencing SaaS purchasing decisions as organizations prioritize eco-conscious practices. Vendors offering energy-efficient infrastructure or carbon-neutral initiatives are becoming more attractive to businesses aiming to align their tech investments with broader sustainability goals. By consolidating tools and eliminating redundancies, organizations can reduce waste while advancing their ESG objectives.
CloudBolt and CloudEagle: Your partners in SaaS optimization
CloudBolt and CloudEagle offer the ideal partnership to help businesses leverage these trends and stay ahead in the evolving SaaS landscape. By combining CloudBolt’s robust cloud management capabilities with CloudEagle’s advanced SaaS optimization platform, organizations can achieve:
- Enhanced visibility: Access detailed insights into SaaS and cloud spending through a unified dashboard, making it easier to identify inefficiencies and cost-saving opportunities.
- Proactive optimization: Leverage AI-powered analytics to streamline renewals, consolidate overlapping tools, and reallocate unused licenses, minimizing waste across your SaaS portfolio.
- Simplified vendor management: Use benchmarking tools and centralized workflows to negotiate smarter contracts and secure favorable terms with vendors.
- Sustainability initiatives: Align your SaaS investments with ESG goals by reducing redundancies and selecting eco-conscious providers.
Together, CloudBolt and CloudEagle make it easier to implement the best practices outlined in this guide and prepare your SaaS strategy for the future.
Ready to optimize your SaaS stack? Take the next step in your SaaS optimization journey. Schedule a free demo today to see how CloudBolt and CloudEagle can help you simplify SaaS management, reduce costs, and achieve your business goals.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on SaaS Cost Optimization
1. What metrics should I track for effective SaaS cost optimization?
Tracking the right metrics is essential for identifying areas to reduce costs and improve efficiency. Metrics like license utilization rates, the average cost per user for each app, and app overlap (how many tools perform the same function) offer valuable insights.
Renewal timelines are also critical, as they help you prepare for upcoming contract evaluations. By consistently tracking these metrics, businesses can build a clear picture of where spending is inefficient and take targeted actions to address it.
2. How do I prioritize which SaaS apps to optimize first?
When prioritizing SaaS apps for optimization, it’s best to start with those that have the highest costs but show the lowest levels of usage. Applications with overlapping features across departments should also be addressed, as consolidating them can lead to immediate cost savings.
Additionally, focusing on tools with upcoming renewal dates gives you an opportunity to renegotiate terms or explore alternatives before committing to another contract cycle. For example, if two project management tools serve similar purposes, consolidating them into one platform reduces redundancy and streamlines workflows.
3. Are there risks in consolidating SaaS vendors?
Consolidating SaaS vendors offers many benefits, such as reduced complexity and cost savings, but it can also introduce risks. Relying too heavily on a single provider may create dependency, limiting your flexibility if the vendor raises prices or fails to meet expectations.
To mitigate these risks, evaluate vendors thoroughly for scalability, reliability, and support. Negotiating contracts with flexible terms or escape clauses provides a safety net, and identifying alternative solutions ensures your business can adapt if issues arise.
4. What’s the difference between SaaS cost optimization and SaaS management?
SaaS cost optimization specifically focuses on reducing waste and maximizing the return on investment from SaaS tools. This includes eliminating unused licenses, consolidating overlapping apps, and renegotiating contracts for better pricing.
SaaS management, on the other hand, encompasses broader responsibilities, such as maintaining security, ensuring compliance, and managing the lifecycle of all SaaS applications. While optimization is a key component, SaaS management involves a more holistic approach to the organization’s software ecosystem.
As businesses increasingly adopt cloud technologies, managing these environments has become more complex. To optimize resources, reduce costs, and accelerate service delivery, cloud automation and orchestration are essential components of modern IT strategies.
This guide explores the distinct roles of cloud automation and orchestration and presents best practices to drive real business outcomes through these processes.
Cloud Automation and Orchestration: An Overview
Defining Cloud Automation
Cloud automation refers to the use of software tools, scripts, and workflows to perform specific tasks within a cloud environment without manual intervention. These tasks can include provisioning servers, configuring networks, managing storage, and deploying applications. By automating routine processes, cloud automation enables IT teams to scale operations more efficiently, reduce errors, and free up resources to focus on higher-value tasks.
Defining Cloud Orchestration
Cloud orchestration goes a step further by coordinating multiple automated tasks into comprehensive workflows that span across environments. While automation focuses on individual tasks, orchestration brings together these tasks, arranging them in a sequence that fulfills broader operational goals. For example, deploying a multi-tier application across a hybrid cloud environment might involve automating various tasks like setting up servers, configuring security protocols, and balancing network traffic. As IT environments grow more complex, orchestration allows organizations to maintain consistency, scalability, and performance across diverse cloud setups.
Cloud orchestration generally refers to combining numerous automations across any cloud necessary to achieve a broader goal.
Benefits of Cloud Automation
Cost Reduction
Cloud automation minimizes operational costs by streamlining processes like server provisioning, application deployment, and security management. Automated systems dynamically allocate resources, reducing underutilization and optimizing performance without manual intervention. This dynamic, real-time management reduces costs while maintaining optimal resource usage, a critical factor in modern cloud environments where agility is key.
For example, CloudBolt has enabled institutions, like a major U.S. university, to manage their cloud resources across multiple environments efficiently by automating resource provisioning, centralizing management, and enabling self-service access to critical IT resources. This automation reduced shadow IT, empowered faculty and students with flexible IT resources, and drove meaningful cost savings.
Scalability
Automation empowers organizations to scale their operations quickly as business needs evolve. Automated workflows allow cloud resources to be provisioned, adjusted, and decommissioned in response to real-time demand, preventing overprovisioning and reducing resource waste. By automating these adjustments, businesses can scale seamlessly, growing their cloud infrastructure alongside their organizational needs without manual intervention or downtime.
In the case of the university, CloudBolt’s solution helped the IT team scale cloud resources in response to increased demand from faculty and students. By offering self-service capabilities and on-demand provisioning, CloudBolt enabled efficient resource allocation during peak periods, which helped the university maintain a responsive and agile infrastructure.
Speed
Automation drastically accelerates the speed at which routine tasks are performed so operations that previously took hours or days take only minutes to be completed. Automating processes such as application deployment and resource configuration boosts overall business agility, allowing organizations to bring new services to market faster. This efficiency is crucial in industries where rapid innovation and responsiveness are competitive advantages.
Benefits of Cloud Orchestration
Improved Efficiency
Cloud orchestration ensures that automated tasks are not only performed efficiently but also in a coordinated manner. By streamlining complex workflows across various cloud environments, orchestration reduces bottlenecks and optimizes resource use.
In hybrid and multi-cloud setups, advanced orchestration solutions allow for real-time resource coordination and load balancing, minimizing downtime and ensuring seamless operations across platforms. This holistic approach improves performance and maximizes resource utilization, making sure that every part of the infrastructure contributes to overall efficiency.
Enhanced Security
Orchestration plays a key role in maintaining security across cloud environments by ensuring that security protocols are consistently applied across automated workflows. This reduces the risk of breaches while meeting regulatory requirements. By automating security workflows through orchestration, organizations maintain real-time governance, minimizing vulnerabilities while enhancing operational flexibility.
Governance and Compliance
Operating across multi-cloud environments brings governance and compliance challenges. Orchestration enforces policies uniformly, aligning each automated task with company standards and regulatory needs. Advanced orchestration platforms help companies dynamically manage these requirements, minimizing compliance risks and streamlining audits.
Cloud Automation and Orchestration Use Cases
The combined power of cloud automation and orchestration is particularly evident in real-world applications, where they address complex challenges and enhance operational efficiency across various scenarios.
Multi-Cloud Resource Management
In multi-cloud environments, organizations often need to manage resources across various platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Cloud automation simplifies resource provisioning, while orchestration synchronizes workflows across platforms, dynamically balancing workloads and reducing downtime. By implementing an orchestration layer that provides unified visibility and intelligence across multi-cloud environments, businesses can optimize their operations and reduce silos that arise in complex infrastructures.
CI/CD Pipelines
Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines rely heavily on automation to manage repetitive tasks like code deployment, testing, and integration. However, as these processes scale, orchestration becomes essential for managing the flow of code between development and production environments. Orchestration coordinates testing, feedback, and deployment steps to streamline updates and reduce errors.
Disaster Recovery
Disaster recovery depends on efficient, automated processes to minimize downtime. Automation helps by regularly backing up critical data and resources, while orchestration coordinates the complex recovery steps to minimize downtime. An orchestrated approach manages failover procedures, such as restoring data and rerouting traffic, so organizations can resume operations quickly after disruptions.
The integration of automated disaster recovery with intelligent orchestration means that organizations can minimize human intervention and react more quickly to recover from critical system failures.
Ready to Run: A Guide to Maturing Your FinOps Automation
Get the ebook
Common Challenges in Cloud Automation
Implementing cloud automation and orchestration can significantly enhance operational efficiency, but it also comes with its own set of challenges. Understanding these challenges and knowing how to address them is crucial for successful deployment and ongoing management.
Complexity of Legacy System Integration
Cloud automation often involves integrating existing infrastructure with modern cloud environments, which can be complex. Legacy systems may not be flexible enough to integrate seamlessly with cloud-based tools, requiring specialized expertise and potentially significant effort. Organizations must invest in proper planning, testing, and possibly upgrades to ensure smooth integration.
Tool Compatibility and Integration
In multi-cloud or hybrid environments, automating workflows with various cloud tools often requires seamless integration across platforms. If the right automation tools are not selected or configured properly, organizations can face significant compatibility issues that can slow down processes and create inefficiencies. Choosing automation platforms with open integration capabilities and strong APIs can help mitigate this challenge.
Skill Gaps
Cloud automation requires specialized knowledge, especially when working with more advanced tools or dealing with complex cloud environments. There is often a shortage of qualified professionals who can implement and maintain these systems effectively. Upskilling existing teams and partnering with vendors that offer robust training and support are key strategies to bridge this gap.
Common Challenges in Cloud Orchestration
Complexity of Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Environments
Orchestrating workflows across multiple cloud environments requires managing dependencies between different systems and maintaining seamless coordination. This complexity can increase as the number of cloud platforms and services grows, making it harder to monitor and manage all interactions effectively. Careful planning and the use of sophisticated orchestration tools designed for multi-cloud environments can help mitigate these challenges.
Security and Compliance Risks
Orchestrating tasks across different environments increases the risk of security breaches if not properly managed. Sensitive data moving between cloud platforms needs to be secured at all stages. Organizations must adopt security best practices such as encryption, secure APIs, and compliance monitoring to reduce risks. Automating these processes, along with strong security orchestration tools, can help consistently meet governance and compliance requirements.
Lack of Visibility and Monitoring
With multiple tasks and systems working together, maintaining visibility and tracking the progress of orchestrated workflows can become difficult. Without proper monitoring tools in place, organizations risk losing track of workflows, which can lead to delays or errors. Orchestration platforms with built-in monitoring and analytics capabilities provide the visibility required so tasks are executed correctly and on time.
Best Practices for Implementing Cloud Automation and Orchestration
Implementing cloud automation and orchestration requires careful planning and a strategic approach. By following best practices, organizations can transition smoothly, minimize risks, and maximize the benefits of these powerful technologies. For a comprehensive step-by-step approach, our Ready to Run eGuide offers a structured guide to implementing automation best practices.
Start Small and Scale
When introducing cloud automation and orchestration, it’s wise to start with simpler tasks before tackling more complex processes. Automating and orchestrating basic operations, such as routine backups or simple server provisioning, allows your team to test and refine strategies in a controlled environment.
A phased approach not only minimizes risk but also promotes efficiency as automation scales. AI-driven automation platforms, like CloudBolt’s Augmented FinOps, can optimize this approach by proactively identifying opportunities, allowing businesses to scale intelligently and without unnecessary manual intervention.
Select the Right Tools
Choosing the right tools is crucial for successful cloud automation and orchestration. The tools should integrate with existing infrastructures, provide robust APIs for seamless integration, and scale with the organization’s needs. Platforms that leverage advanced AI/ML-driven insights can continuously optimize cloud environments, ensuring operational efficiency and cost savings in real-time.
Build a Strong Foundation with People and Processes
Effective cloud automation and orchestration requires skilled teams and defined processes. Investing in training prepares team members to handle the technical and operational nuances of automation. Additionally, defining clear roles and responsibilities minimizes overlap, increases accountability, and keeps automation workflows running smoothly. By mapping out existing workflows to identify where automation can enhance efficiency, organizations can reduce errors and establish a sustainable, scalable framework. Building this foundational layer creates resilience in cloud automation efforts, setting the stage for seamless scaling as business needs evolve.
Implement Full Lifecycle Automation
To fully realize the benefits of cloud automation and orchestration, businesses should aim to implement full lifecycle automation. This approach automates the entire cloud resource lifecycle—from initial provisioning to ongoing management and eventual decommissioning. By automating at every stage, resources are continually optimized for both performance and cost, eliminating waste and reducing operational overhead.
Lifecycle automation also empowers IT teams to be more proactive. AI-driven platforms can anticipate demand changes, predict resource needs, and adjust configurations automatically, ensuring smooth operations without manual intervention. With full lifecycle automation, businesses can unlock the power of continuous, efficient cloud management, allowing them to focus on strategic initiatives rather than routine tasks.
Align Automation with Real Business Outcomes and Financial Metrics
Cloud automation should be designed not just for operational efficiency but also as a strategic driver of business value. By aligning automation efforts with measurable financial outcomes, organizations shift automation from a purely technical initiative to a source of tangible ROI. Setting clear financial goals—such as cost savings, improved resource utilization, and overall ROI—enables teams to measure the impact of automation on the organization’s bottom line.
Integrating FinOps metrics, like cloud spend per team or per service, helps pinpoint where automation delivers the highest return, providing a data-driven basis for refining strategies. Regularly reviewing these metrics ensures that automation remains adaptable to changing business needs and continues to deliver value. By grounding cloud automation initiatives in real business outcomes, organizations can more effectively demonstrate the financial and strategic benefits of their cloud investments.
Elevate Your Cloud Automation and Orchestration with CloudBolt
CloudBolt’s Augmented FinOps solution is uniquely positioned to enhance your cloud automation and orchestration efforts. By integrating advanced AI/ML-driven insights with full lifecycle automation, CloudBolt transforms how you manage cloud resources, ensuring that every automated task is not only executed efficiently but also contributes to a broader, strategic objective.
With CloudBolt’s Augmented FinOps, you can:
- Automate with Intelligence: Leverage AI-enhanced automation to not just execute tasks but optimize them for cost-effectiveness and performance across your entire cloud environment.
- Orchestrate with Precision: Seamlessly coordinate complex workflows across multi-cloud and hybrid environments, ensuring that every process is aligned with your organizational goals and financial objectives.
- Achieve Full Lifecycle Optimization: From initial provisioning to ongoing management and optimization, CloudBolt ensures that your cloud resources are continuously aligned with both operational needs and financial strategies.
By adopting CloudBolt’s Augmented FinOps, you empower your organization to move beyond simple automation, achieving a level of orchestration that drives real business value. This holistic approach to cloud management not only addresses today’s challenges but also prepares your organization for the future, where intelligent automation and orchestration are key to staying competitive.
Don’t wait—transform your cloud operations today. Schedule a demo to experience how CloudBolt can elevate your automation and orchestration strategy to new heights.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between cloud automation and cloud orchestration?
Cloud automation is the process of using software tools and scripts to perform repetitive tasks within a cloud environment, such as provisioning servers or deploying applications, without requiring manual intervention. It streamlines individual tasks and enhances efficiency. Cloud orchestration, however, takes automation to the next level by coordinating multiple automated tasks into unified workflows. For instance, orchestration ensures that tasks like provisioning, security checks, and load balancing occur in the correct sequence, enabling complex processes like multi-tier application deployment to run seamlessly across hybrid or multi-cloud environments.
Why are cloud automation and orchestration important?
These technologies are critical for managing modern IT environments efficiently. Cloud automation reduces manual workload, eliminates errors, and accelerates routine tasks, while orchestration ensures these automated tasks work together toward strategic objectives. Together, they enable businesses to optimize resource usage, reduce costs, and improve agility, allowing them to adapt quickly to changes in demand or market conditions. For example, e-commerce companies can dynamically adjust their resources to handle high traffic during sales events, ensuring customer satisfaction and minimizing downtime.
What are the main challenges of implementing cloud automation and orchestration?
Organizations often encounter obstacles such as integrating legacy systems with modern cloud platforms, which may lack compatibility or flexibility. Tool compatibility across different cloud providers can also create roadblocks in multi-cloud or hybrid setups. Furthermore, skill gaps in IT teams often hinder the adoption and maintenance of automation and orchestration solutions. Security risks and compliance challenges, particularly when managing workflows across multiple cloud environments, add another layer of complexity that organizations must address through robust planning and technology selection.
How do cloud automation tools integrate with existing IT systems?
Modern cloud automation tools are designed with flexibility and integration in mind. They often feature robust APIs and connectors that allow seamless interaction with legacy systems, public cloud platforms, and third-party applications. For example, an automation platform can pull data from an organization’s on-premises infrastructure, analyze it in a cloud environment, and deliver results back to the original system. Organizations should prioritize selecting tools with open architecture and support for widely-used protocols to simplify integration and future-proof their IT investments.
What are some best practices for cloud automation and orchestration?
To successfully implement cloud automation and orchestration, organizations should start by automating simple tasks such as backups or server provisioning. Gradually scaling to more complex workflows allows teams to identify and address challenges early. Selecting the right tools that align with the organization’s current infrastructure and future needs is essential, as is investing in team training to build necessary skills. Establishing clear governance and compliance guidelines helps ensure consistency and security across all automated processes.
Can cloud automation reduce operational costs?
Yes, cloud automation significantly reduces operational costs by optimizing resource allocation, minimizing manual effort, and lowering the likelihood of errors. For example, automated scaling ensures resources are provisioned only when needed, avoiding overprovisioning. This is particularly useful in dynamic industries like media streaming or online retail, where demand fluctuates unpredictably. By aligning resource usage with real-time requirements, businesses can achieve substantial cost savings while maintaining performance.
How does AI enhance cloud automation and orchestration?
AI and machine learning bring intelligence to automation and orchestration, enabling systems to proactively identify inefficiencies, optimize resource usage, and adapt to changing workloads. AI-powered platforms can analyze historical usage patterns to predict future demands, automatically scaling resources to prevent performance bottlenecks. Additionally, AI enhances security by detecting anomalies in real time and automating responses to mitigate risks. These capabilities not only improve operational efficiency but also help organizations make data-driven decisions faster.
What industries benefit most from cloud automation and orchestration?
Industries with complex IT demands and rapid growth benefit the most from these technologies. For instance, financial services can use automation to handle high-volume transaction processing securely. Healthcare organizations leverage orchestration to manage patient data across cloud platforms while maintaining compliance. In education, universities automate resource provisioning for students and faculty, as demonstrated by a U.S. university that implemented CloudBolt to centralize resource management and reduce shadow IT costs. Retailers also benefit by dynamically scaling resources during seasonal spikes in demand.
What is full lifecycle automation in cloud management?
Full lifecycle automation refers to the automation of every stage of a resource’s lifecycle, from provisioning and configuration to scaling, optimization, and decommissioning. This approach minimizes waste and reduces manual effort throughout the resource’s lifecycle. For example, AI-driven platforms can anticipate changes in demand, adjust configurations proactively, and retire unused resources, ensuring cost-effective and efficient operations. Full lifecycle automation not only optimizes resource usage but also empowers IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
How can CloudBolt help with cloud automation and orchestration?
CloudBolt offers advanced solutions like Augmented FinOps, which combines AI-driven insights with robust automation capabilities. This platform allows organizations to automate repetitive tasks, coordinate complex workflows, and align cloud management with business objectives. For example, CloudBolt’s ability to integrate seamlessly with both legacy systems and modern cloud platforms enables IT teams to adopt automation without disrupting existing operations. These capabilities empower businesses to scale efficiently, control costs, and drive innovation in hybrid and multi-cloud environments.
Throughout this series, we’ve emphasized that automation is more than just technology—it’s about the people, processes, and principles creating a solid foundation for success. In the Crawl and Walk phases, we discussed establishing and scaling automation by focusing on these critical elements.
Now, in the Run phase, your organization is ready to refine and enhance its automation strategy. But the challenge here is not just about maintaining automation—it’s about ensuring your efforts are sustainable, scalable, and aligned with long-term business goals. In this final installment, we’ll explore how to embed continuous improvement, strategic alignment, and advanced technologies into your automation framework for sustained success.
Create a Culture of Continuous Improvement and Innovation
At the Run stage, automation should foster a culture of continuous improvement and innovation. Leading organizations apply continuous improvement frameworks like Kaizen or Six Sigma to automation processes. The Kaizen approach encourages all employees to make minor, incremental enhancements to processes, while Six Sigma provides a more formal, data-driven framework for reducing variation and improving efficiency. Blending these methodologies creates an environment where innovation and improvement become part of the everyday work culture.
Actionable Tip
Dedicate specific “innovation days” where teams have the freedom to brainstorm and test new automation ideas. This fosters a proactive problem-solving culture, where employees continuously look for ways to optimize and future-proof automation.
Innovation isn’t just about solving immediate problems; it should also focus on long-term growth and efficiency. Encourage teams to take a proactive approach to problem-solving by anticipating challenges and identifying opportunities for further automation. This could involve conducting regular what-if scenarios to explore potential future challenges or setting up dedicated innovation labs where teams can experiment with new automation ideas.
Align Automation with Strategic Objectives
As the organization’s long-term business goals evolve, so must automation initiatives. One way to maintain strategic alignment is to integrate dynamic planning processes where automation initiatives are regularly reviewed and adjusted to match evolving objectives. Static, multi-year automation plans can quickly become outdated in today’s fast-paced environment. Instead, focus on developing adaptive roadmaps that account for shifts in market dynamics, internal priorities, and emerging technologies.
Actionable Tip
Conduct quarterly strategic reviews to ensure your automation efforts remain aligned with the organization’s evolving objectives. Use these reviews to recalibrate initiatives, reprioritize projects, and incorporate feedback from key stakeholders.
Automation should be dynamic and flexible, ready to adjust to new business goals as they arise. Whether the company shifts focus to new markets, expands product lines, or responds to external pressures, automation must evolve alongside these changes. Regularly revisiting automation outcomes and strategic goals helps keep your efforts in sync with the bigger picture.
Ready to Run: A Guide to Maturing Your FinOps Automation
Get the guide
Develop a Continuous Feedback Loop
To keep automation relevant and effective, organizations need a robust feedback loop. Collect feedback not only from individuals working on automation projects but also from cross-functional teams who may interact with these processes. Teams working on automation projects can review each other’s workflows and provide constructive feedback, fostering knowledge sharing and cross-functional collaboration.
However, not all feedback is created equal. Prioritize data-driven feedback backed by performance metrics to ensure that the most actionable insights are applied. By integrating feedback with data analysis, teams can focus on improvements that deliver the highest ROI.
Actionable Tip
After gathering feedback, hold regular "feedback resolution meetings" to communicate what actions have been taken in response. This shows employees that their input leads to tangible improvements, which builds trust and engagement in the automation process.
The key to effective feedback is closing the loop—ensuring that feedback not only leads to action but is communicated back to the team. Once employees see that their feedback leads to real changes, they will likely further engage and trust in the automation process.
Leverage Advanced Analytics
At this stage, automation should no longer rely on reactive data analysis. Instead, organizations should move toward predictive and prescriptive analytics to avoid potential issues and optimize workflows in real time. Predictive analytics allows teams to forecast future trends based on historical data, helping to identify bottlenecks before they occur or to anticipate resource needs in advance.
Prescriptive analytics goes one step further, providing actionable recommendations on adjusting processes for optimal results. For example, these tools can automatically suggest adjustments to cloud resources or workflow changes based on real-time data, guiding teams toward the best outcomes for efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Actionable Tip
Introduce prescriptive analytics tools that deliver recommendations on how to improve automation workflows. These tools can suggest resource reallocation or workflow adjustments, helping teams stay ahead of potential issues and maximize efficiency.
Risk Management
With increased automation comes increased risk. As automation takes over more processes, the potential for operational disruptions or security vulnerabilities grows. A comprehensive risk management strategy is essential to mitigate these risks. Start by developing a downtime recovery plan that outlines the steps to take in the event of system failures. This plan should include both immediate responses and long-term recovery strategies.
Equally important are security audits. Conduct regular assessments to ensure your automation systems comply with the latest security standards and regulatory requirements, such as GDPR or CCPA. Proactive risk management not only safeguards operations but also ensures that automation initiatives remain compliant and sustainable in the long run.
Actionable Tip
Assemble a dedicated risk management team responsible for monitoring automation workflows for security vulnerabilities, compliance risks, and operational threats. Regularly update your risk protocols to address new challenges as they arise.
Conclusion
The Run phase of automation is about ensuring your efforts are sustainable, scalable, and continuously improving. By fostering a culture of continuous innovation, aligning automation with strategic business objectives, leveraging advanced analytics, and managing risks effectively, you set your organization up for long-term success.
By following the principles outlined in the Crawl, Walk, and Run phases, your organization can achieve a seamless, sustainable automation journey that drives efficiency, innovation, and competitive advantage well into the future.
Thank you for following this three-part series on successful automation. If you’re ready to take your automation efforts to the next level, CloudBolt’s Augmented FinOps solution can guide you every step of the way—from automating repetitive tasks to achieving real-time optimization and strategic cloud cost alignment. Download our Ready to Run: A Guide to Maturing Your FinOps Automation ebook, and book a demo to see it in action and discover how our platform can accelerate your journey to the Run stage of FinOps automation.
In our previous post, we explored how to lay the groundwork for automation by focusing on the essential processes and principles that must be in place before introducing technology. As your organization progresses to the Walk phase, the focus now shifts from laying the groundwork to scaling these initiatives.
Scaling automation isn’t simply about deploying more technology. It’s about creating a supportive environment that embraces automation while managing the changes it brings. Without the right cultural support and change management, even the best automation tools can fall flat. Let’s take a closer look at the steps you need to take to scale automation effectively.
Effectively Communicate Automation’s Value
Embedding automation into the very fabric of your operations requires a shift in mindset across the organization. While resistance is natural—especially if employees are concerned about job security or changes to their workflows—leaders must champion automation efforts and communicate its value clearly and consistently. Automation isn’t just about replacing jobs; it’s about freeing up time for more strategic activities, such as data analysis, optimization, and creative problem-solving.
One of the most effective ways to build confidence in automation is by sharing data-driven success stories from within the organization. These stories should illustrate automation’s tangible impact on key business metrics, such as a 20% reduction in manual processing time or a 30% increase in cloud cost efficiency.
Actionable Tip: Create a centralized success tracker where teams can log and share improvements driven by automation. Review this data quarterly to celebrate wins and identify areas for further enhancement.
By showcasing internal wins, you build momentum for broader adoption and demonstrate how automation directly contributes to your organization’s goals.
Managing Change
Scaling automation requires a comprehensive change management plan that outlines how workflows will change, who will be affected, and what support will be provided during the transition. Without a clear roadmap, automation initiatives can cause confusion and inefficiencies.
Start by clearly defining the objectives of your automation efforts and mapping out specific changes. Next, establish a realistic timeline that allows for gradual change so employees have enough time to adjust and leadership can monitor the impact. Finally, allocate both human and financial resources to support a smooth shift.
Actionable Tip: Assign change champions within each department to act as liaisons between employees and leadership. These champions reinforce communication and ensure employees have a dedicated point of contact to address concerns.
Empowering key employees to champion automation increases buy-in and provides a clear point of reference for team members during the transition.
Training and Upskilling
As automation scales, the complexity of tools and processes often increases, requiring specific technical skills and domain knowledge to operate them efficiently. To address this, organizations should implement targeted training programs and provide ongoing support to ensure employees are equipped with the knowledge and skills needed to operate automation tools efficiently.
One of the most effective ways to manage the increasing complexity of automation is through tiered training programs that cater to different levels of expertise. By offering role-based training, organizations can ensure that employees receive the specific knowledge they need based on their position and interaction with the tools. For example, operations staff may need more hands-on technical training, while leadership might benefit from understanding how to use automation data for strategic decision-making.
Actionable Tip: Encourage employees to use sandbox environments to experiment with automation settings without impacting live processes. This builds confidence in their skills and allows for hands-on learning.
To further motivate your team and enhance their expertise in cloud automation, consider encouraging them to pursue industry-recognized certifications, like AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional, which focuses on automation and cloud architecture. Companies can offer financial support by covering exam fees, providing paid study time, and tying certifications to career advancement opportunities like promotions or leadership roles. Additionally, recognizing and rewarding employees who achieve certifications fosters a culture of continuous learning and motivates others to follow suit.
Measuring Impact
Measuring automation’s long-term impact goes beyond tracking basic KPIs. While metrics like efficiency gains, cost savings, and resource optimization are important, evaluating how automation aligns with strategic goals and drives business transformation is critical.
For example, ask yourself: Is automation enabling teams to shift focus toward higher-value tasks? Is it improving decision-making through real-time insights? Could automation be optimized in other areas to reduce time-to-market or enhance customer satisfaction?
It’s also essential to track leading indicators—such as reduced manual touchpoints or improved process accuracy—that signal the effectiveness of automation before larger business outcomes are realized. Leading indicators give early insights into whether your automation initiatives are set up for success or need adjustment.
Actionable Tip: Set up real-time dashboards that track both immediate KPIs and leading indicators tied to long-term business objectives. Conduct quarterly reviews of these metrics to assess progress and recalibrate efforts if needed.
Iterative Improvement
Automation is not a set-it-and-forget-it solution. Successful organizations take a continuous improvement approach, always looking for ways to optimize and refine their automated workflows. This mindset ensures that automation remains efficient, adaptable, and aligned with changing business needs.
Post-implementation reviews can be especially effective as they provide dedicated time for teams to assess what worked well and what needs improvement. Experimentation and iteration allow teams to refine their automation efforts gradually, which can lead to significant performance gains over time.
Actionable Tip: Encourage teams to adopt a "fail fast, learn faster" approach. Implement regular post-automation retrospectives, where the focus isn't just on what worked, but on rapid testing of new hypotheses to improve efficiency. For instance, introduce A/B testing for automated workflows or run small-scale pilots of new iterations before full-scale rollouts. Tracking performance gains after each tweak helps drive incremental improvements over time.
Conclusion
Scaling automation isn’t just about deploying more tools—it’s about creating a culture that embraces automation and managing the changes that come with it. You create an environment where automation can thrive by clearly communicating the value of automation, managing change effectively, upskilling your workforce, and fostering continuous improvement.
In the final installment of this series, we’ll explore the Run phase, where continuous improvement in automation aligns with your organization’s long-term strategic objectives. Stay tuned for Part 3 as we explore how to fully integrate automation into your operations.
Ready to Run: A Guide to Maturing Your FinOps Automation
Get the guide
Automation is often synonymous with technology—tools, software, and platforms that promise to streamline operations and boost efficiency. However, successful automation is more than just the tools; it’s about the people who implement it and the processes it enhances. This blog series focuses on the non-technical elements of automation—the people, processes, and principles that form the bedrock of any successful strategy.
In this first installment, we’ll explore how to lay the groundwork for automation by focusing on essential processes and principles. True automation success doesn’t start with the latest tools but with building a solid foundation that ensures your organization is ready for the journey ahead.
Assess Current Capabilities
Before diving into automation, evaluate your current processes. This is a crucial first step. Map out workflows and identify bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and repetitive tasks prone to error. Are there gaps in your current documentation? Inconsistent workflows across departments? By understanding these shortcomings, you can prioritize which processes to automate first. Building automation on a weak foundation risks compounding inefficiencies, not solving them.
Actionable Tip:
Tools like Lucidchart or Visio can help create visual representations of workflows, detailing each step, decision point, and responsible party. Once you have clarity, use these insights to shape automation goals that address inefficiencies.
After evaluating, pinpoint gaps that could prevent successful automation. These might include outdated technology, inconsistent workflows, or a lack of standardized procedures. Addressing these gaps early ensures that automation is built on solid ground.
Finally, establish clear, measurable objectives for your automation initiatives using the SMART framework (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound). For instance, you might aim to reduce manual data entry by 50% within six months. Having well-defined objectives provides direction and allows you to measure the success of your automation efforts.
Document and Standardize Processes
Detailed process documentation is the backbone of effective automation. Everyone involved should understand workflows, ensuring consistency across the board. Without thorough documentation, automation can lead to confusion and inefficiencies. To start, you can create process maps that detail each step in your workflows, including inputs, outputs, decision points, and responsible parties. This level of detail not only aids in automation but also helps identify any areas that need improvement before automation begins.
Actionable Tip:
Prioritize standardization if your processes are siloed or ad hoc across teams. This ensures automation is applied universally and helps keep everyone aligned.
Equally important is standardizing processes across teams. This ensures that automation efforts are consistent, regardless of who executes them. It also reduces the risk of errors and makes scaling automation across the organization easier. For example, if different departments handle customer data differently, standardizing these processes ensures that automation can be applied universally, leading to more reliable outcomes. Standardization also simplifies training and onboarding, as new employees can quickly learn the standardized processes.
Ready to Run: A Guide to Maturing Your FinOps Automation
Get the guide
Cross-Functional Collaboration
Automation initiatives often touch multiple departments, from IT to operations to finance, so it’s essential to involve representatives from all relevant teams early. This collaboration helps ensure that automation aligns with the organization’s broader objectives and has the support of all stakeholders. When departments work in silos, it’s easy for automation efforts to become fragmented or misaligned with overall business goals so encourage open communication, regular check-ins, and cross-functional teams to ensure that everyone is on the same page.
Actionable Tip:
Use tools like Asana, Slack, or Microsoft Teams to facilitate real-time communication, project tracking, and issue resolution. Regular check-ins ensure alignment and help address concerns as they arise.
Pilot Testing
Before rolling out automation across the entire organization, it’s wise to start with small-scale pilot tests. These tests allow you to identify potential issues and gather feedback before scaling up. For example, you might start by automating a single repetitive task, such as invoice processing, and then expand automation efforts based on the pilot’s success.
Actionable Tip:
You may want to run a mock scenario to simulate how the process improvements would work and identify any adjustments before fully committing resources.
After you’ve completed the small-scale testing, gather honest feedback about what worked well and what didn’t and use it to refine your processes. Iterative testing and feedback loops help optimize automation before full deployment, minimizing costly errors or disruptions during the broader rollout.
Conclusion
Building a strong foundation is the most critical step in the automation journey. By thoroughly assessing your current capabilities, documenting and standardizing processes, fostering cross-functional collaboration, and conducting pilot tests, you prepare your organization for automation success. These steps ensure that your automation efforts are built on a well-prepared foundation, minimizing risks and maximizing benefits.
In the next blog, we’ll explore the Walk phase—scaling automation with a focus on culture and change management. We’ll discuss how to create a supportive environment that embraces automation and manages the changes it brings. Stay tuned for Part 2 of this essential series on successful automation!
In a world where advancements in technology and innovation are moving at breakneck speed, FinOps is crawling at a snail’s pace. Whether it’s curating reports, tagging resources, or forecasting cloud spend, many FinOps teams currently rely heavily on manual processes. This limited and outdated approach prevents FinOps from delivering the business value it should and can.
If your team is struggling with manual workflows, our Ready to Run: A Guide to Maturing Your FinOps Automation eGuide provides actionable strategies to transition from manual processes to full automation, driving efficiency and greater ROI.
But first, let’s explore why manual FinOps processes are no longer enough.
The Problem with Manual FinOps Processes
At first glance, manual processes may seem manageable, especially for smaller cloud environments or early-stage FinOps teams. But as cloud usage grows, the limitations of manual FinOps quickly become apparent:
- Slower decision-making: Gathering cloud cost data from multiple sources, compiling reports, and manually assigning optimization tasks takes significant time. By the time the data is ready, it’s often outdated, leaving teams to make decisions based on information that no longer reflects real-time cloud usage. This delay not only slows down strategic decisions but can also affect the company’s ability to react to cost spikes or over-provisioning in a timely manner.
- Inconsistent processes: When different departments handle cloud costs manually, there’s little to no standardization or cross-learning between teams. This lack of coordination leads to inefficiencies, duplication of efforts, and a higher risk of errors in cost allocation and reporting. Without a unified process, departments might adopt conflicting methodologies, further complicating cost visibility and governance.
- Missed optimization opportunities: Without access to real-time, actionable insights, FinOps teams are often forced to rely on retrospective data. This prevents them from identifying and acting on immediate cost-saving opportunities, such as rightsizing resources or taking advantage of reserved instance discounts. As a result, the organization continues to accrue unnecessary cloud spend, which compounds over time and erodes potential savings.
If any of this sounds familiar, it’s time to start thinking about automation.
Ready to Run: A Guide to Maturing Your FinOps Automation
Download the Guide
How Automation Transforms FinOps
FinOps automation is about more than just speeding up processes—it’s about empowering teams to act faster, make smarter decisions, and ultimately drive greater ROI from cloud investments. Here are three key areas where automation can make an immediate impact:
1. Real-Time Insights
Manual FinOps processes mean relying on historical data to make decisions, which can be outdated by the time teams act on it. Automation provides real-time visibility into cloud usage, costs, and performance, enabling FinOps teams to act quickly and decisively. This immediate access to current data helps organizations proactively manage their cloud environments, preventing unnecessary spend before it happens and empowering teams to course-correct when anomalies arise.
2. Cost Optimization at Scale
Automation tools continuously monitor cloud resources and make real-time adjustments to optimize usage without requiring human intervention. Whether it’s rightsizing instances or decommissioning idle resources, automation ensures that cloud environments are always running at peak efficiency. This proactive approach to cost optimization helps FinOps teams keep spending under control, even as cloud usage scales and becomes increasingly complex. The result is not just reduced costs but also the ability to handle optimization at a scale that would be impossible with manual processes.
3. Standardized Workflows
Without automation, different teams may use their own methods to manually manage cloud costs, leading to inconsistencies and potential errors. Automation enables standardized workflows that ensure consistency, accuracy, and accountability across the organization. These workflows establish a unified approach to cloud cost management, reducing the risk of oversight and providing a single source of truth for all teams to rely on. This standardization helps streamline decision-making and fosters cross-department collaboration, ultimately creating a more efficient FinOps culture.
Start Your Automation Journey Today
The longer FinOps teams rely on manual processes, the more they risk falling behind in today’s fast-paced cloud landscape. Automation is the key to scaling your operations, driving greater efficiency, more accurate forecasting, and a stronger strategic impact.
Ready to accelerate your FinOps journey? Download Ready to Run: A Guide to Maturing Your FinOps Automation to understand where your team stands in its automation maturity and unlock strategies to transform your operations.
In January 2024, CloudBolt laid out an ambitious vision for Augmented FinOps—a paradigm shift in how organizations manage their cloud investments. Our goal was clear: to integrate AI/ML-driven insights, achieve full lifecycle cloud optimization, and expand FinOps capabilities beyond public clouds. Today, we’re proud to announce that we have laid the bedrock of this vision with the launch of our game-changing platform and its latest innovations: Cloud Native Actions (CNA), the CloudBolt Agent, and the Tech Alliance Program—with even more transformative developments on the horizon.
Cloud Native Actions (CNA)
At the heart of our new platform lies Cloud Native Actions (CNA), a solution designed to transform the traditionally manual and reactive nature of FinOps into a fully automated, ongoing optimization process. CNA continuously optimizes cloud resources, preventing inefficiencies before they occur and accelerating the speed of optimization efforts. With CNA, FinOps teams can automate complex cloud processes, significantly increasing efficiency and reducing the time spent on manual tasks.
CNA’s core benefits include:
- Automating resource management: CNA eliminates unnecessary cloud spend by automatically identifying and correcting inefficiencies with minimal manual effort.
- Optimizing cloud spend in real time: By continuously monitoring and optimizing cloud resources, CNA reduces insight-to-action lead time from weeks to minutes, allowing teams to act on cost-saving opportunities instantly.
- Scaling FinOps without additional headcount: By automating cloud optimization tasks, CNA enables FinOps teams to scale their efforts without increasing operational overhead.
In short, CNA moves organizations from reactive cloud cost management to a proactive, continuous optimization model, keeping cloud resources operating at peak efficiency.
CloudBolt Agent
Another cornerstone of CloudBolt’s recent innovation is the CloudBolt Agent, which extends the power of our FinOps platform to private cloud, Kubernetes, and PaaS environments. The agent allows enterprises to unify their cloud environments under one optimization strategy, facilitating seamless application of cloud-native actions across different infrastructures. By providing intelligent automation and real-time data collection, the CloudBolt Agent eliminates the silos that often prevent effective multi-cloud management.
Key benefits of the CloudBolt Agent:
- Extending automation: CloudBolt’s cloud-native actions—including rightsizing, tagging, and snapshot management—are now available across hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructures.
- Integrating smoothly with private clouds: Unlike traditional approaches requiring custom APIs, the CloudBolt Agent integrates smoothly, allowing organizations to apply consistent optimization policies across all cloud environments.
- Enhancing data collection and lifecycle management: The agent gathers rich metadata and utilization data, enabling precise cost allocation and workload optimization across the enterprise’s entire cloud footprint.
By unifying cloud management, the CloudBolt Agent empowers enterprises to realize the full potential of hybrid and multi-cloud environments, driving ROI and improving operational efficiency.
Tech Alliance Program
Finally, CloudBolt is expanding its reach through the Tech Alliance Program, a strategic initiative designed to enhance the FinOps experience by building a network of integrated solutions. This growing ecosystem reinforces CloudBolt’s commitment to driving value and innovation for FinOps teams—delivering key components of our larger vision while opening up new possibilities for what comes next.
The Tech Alliance Program focuses on:
- Broadening optimization capabilities: The program integrates leading FinOps solutions that align with CloudBolt’s mission to maximize cloud ROI through advanced automation and insights.
- Forming strategic partnerships: While our collaboration with StormForge was announced earlier this year, we are actively exploring new partnerships to expand the scope of our platform.
With the Tech Alliance Program, CloudBolt connects customers with a rich ecosystem of best-in-class solutions that complement FinOps practices and maximize the value derived from cloud investments.
Augmented FinOps is Here
Today’s launch marks a significant step in CloudBolt’s mission to deliver the next generation of FinOps solutions. With Cloud Native Actions, the CloudBolt Agent, and a growing network of partners through the Tech Alliance Program, we’re not just responding to the needs of today’s FinOps teams—we’re shaping the future of cloud financial management. For more details, check out our official press release.
To further explore how AI, automation, and next-gen tools are transforming FinOps, we invite you to join us for an exclusive webinar featuring guest presenter Tracy Woo, Principal Analyst at Forrester Research, on October 22, 2024. Register now for FinOps Reimagined: AI, Automation, and the Rise of 3rd Generation Tools and learn about the future of FinOps.
If you want to see our platform in action, our team would be happy to show you how the new Cloud Native Actions, CloudBolt Agent, and Tech Alliance Program can help your organization optimize cloud investments. Request a demo today!
We are thrilled to announce that CloudBolt has listed its Cloud Management Platform (CMP) and Cloud Cost & Security Management Platform (CSMP) in the AWS Marketplace for the U.S. Intelligence Community (ICMP).
ICMP, a curated digital catalog from Amazon Web Services (AWS), allows government agencies to easily discover, purchase, and deploy software solutions from vendors that specialize in supporting federal customers. Our advanced solutions are now accessible to help agencies maximize value while maintaining compliance with strict security standards.
This listing represents a significant milestone in our mission to empower federal agencies by providing the tools necessary to manage complex cloud environments—whether public, private, hybrid, or air-gapped—with the efficiency and governance they need to meet their mission-critical objectives.
For more details, you can read our full press release here.